Leffingwell v. Griffing
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court,' Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff recovered a money judgment in the Court below, and defendant filed a statement on motion for a new trial. Notice was given for a settlement of the statement on a day named, but before the time defendant paid the judgment, and plaintiff’s attorney entered a satisfaction. Neither party appeared at the time named for a settlement of the statement.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court,' Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff recovered a money judgment in the Court below, and defendant filed a statement on motion for a new trial. Notice was given for a settlement of the statement on a day named, but before the time defendant paid the judgment, and plaintiff’s attorney entered a satisfaction. Neither party appeared at the time named for a settlement of the statement. Defendant’s attorney afterwards gave notice for a settlement of the statement, and both parties appearing, plaintiff’s attorney objected to a…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
This appeal is from an order overruling plaintiff’s objections to defendant’s motion for settlement of a statement on motion for new trial, and ordering said statement to be settled.
The order is not appealable. It was made in the course of proceedings taken with a view to a new trial, and is no more the subject of appeal than the order made in the course of the same proceedings fixing the 13th of February, 1865, as the day for settling the statement.
Further, there is no specification of grounds in the statement accompanying the appeal. The appeal is not based alone…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Haggin v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by2 opinions
- Magee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Rousset v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872