Legal Opinion

People v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1958No. Crim. 6209PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Frank William White, Todd Conover and Harry Hanick were charged with the possession of narcotics in violation of section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code. Conover and Hanick pleaded guilty. Thereafter White was tried by a jury and found guilty. He has appealed, claiming that the trial court erred in failing on its own motion to instruct the jury that certain hearsay testimony was admitted for a limited purpose, that the prosecuting attorney was guilty of misconduct in commenting on the hearsay testimony, and that the judgment of conviction is not supported by the evidence.

Hanick, a known…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. CorriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. WeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. CantrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. MoranteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API