Schouest v. Acadian Construction Services
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
I,Timothy Schouest appeals a judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation which denied his claim for indemnity benefits and medical expenses. The workers’ compensation judge concluded his employer, Acadian Construction Services, had established that intoxication was a cause of his workplace accident. For the following reasons, we affirm the finding of intoxication and reverse the judgment ordering reimbursement of medical benefits.
I
ISSUES
We must determine:
*597(1) whether the trial court erred in excluding Schouest’s deposition testimony;(2) whether Schouest was injured…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son LoggersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. HickmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Romero v. Northrop-GrummanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ronnie Griffith v. CMR Construction & Maintenance Resources and LCTA Workers' CompensationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022