United States v. Central Westrumite Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Transferred from United States Circuit Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Abstract 22924 (T. D. 30447).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
The merchandise is so-called “westrumite asphalt,” manufactured in Canada, and imported at the port of Port Huron, Mich.
The return of the collector states that the duty of 30 per cent ad valorem levied by him was under the provisions of paragraph 56 of the tariff act of 1909 “on certain westrumite (liquid asphalt) * * * returned by the appraiser as liquid asphalt and ammonia (as paint) * *
The protestan! claimed that the goods were dutiable under paragraph 90 of that act as “asphaltum * * * dried or otherwise advanced in any manner * * *.”
At the hearing before the Board of General Appraisers…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fink v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Betz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- United States v. American RailroadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914