Legal Opinion

Herman D. Steel Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 15, 1955No. C. D. 1743PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawkence, Judge:

The collector of customs classified certain articles described in the record as profile cutters, imported from Switzerland, as "Cutting tools containing over .02% tungsten” and, accordingly, imposed duty thereon at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem in paragraph 352 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 352), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802).

Plaintiff, by its original protest and as amended, makes various claims for lower rates of duty but, as stated by plaintiff at the trial, “We rely primarily on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Technical Charts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Upton, Bradeen & James, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API