Legal Opinion

Chinske v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1934No. 16646PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge. —

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of knowingly making a false entry in the books and records of the Pennant Refining Company of the amount of motor fuel and gasoline sold to C. Morgan, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $500.00.

This case grew out of the same transaction as that of H. E. Worbes v. State, *No. 16,645, recently decided by this court. In this case, as in the Worbes case, the appellant questions the sufficiency of the indictment, which, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows: “ * * * That on or about the 5th day of May, A. D.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Janca v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API