Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Co. v. Salmon
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Claybaugh, Judge. Action by James W. Salmon against tbe Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, P. J.
Appellee recovered a judgment for rebuilding a fence along appellant’s right of way, which abuts on his farm. The statute (§5323 Burns 1901, Acts 1885, p. 224) requires railroad companies, within twelve months after the taking effect of the act as to completed roads, and within twelve months from the completion of roads thereafter built, to fence their right of way, when it shall be done, the kind of fence to be made, and that they shall thereafter maintain such fence. The next section (5324 Bums 1901) provides that when the company fails to' build the fence, as required by the above section,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Brooks v. Muncie & Portland Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. FormesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Kuhn v. BowmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Co. v. SalisburyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.