Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Bellis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1985No. 81-3-381; 118 Appeal Docket 1984Published

1DissentHutchinson, Justice

I do not believe the City of Philadelphia has the authority, under the home rule provisions of the First Class Cities Code, to prescribe punishment for conduct which was punishable as a misdemeanor under the general common law. Instead, I believe the General Assembly has delegated to Philadelphia only the power to establish and punish summary offenses and those misdemeanors which describe minor criminal conduct of parochial concern to that municipality and not to the Commonwealth as a whole. See Commonwealth v. Cabell, 199 Pa.Superior Ct. 513, 185 A.2d 611 (1962). I also believe that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Cali v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Lennox v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Addison CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. GloverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API