Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Shurling

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1937No. 12124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Chief Justice.

1. The contrary not being shown, it will be presumed that county warrants when issued are based upon a valid contract duly recorded as provided in the Code, § 23-1701. Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (4) (149 S. E. 776).

2. “An order drawn by the ordinary of a county on the treasurer for the payment of a debt due by the county is evidence of an adjudication by the ordinary that the amount stated in the order is due; and the treasurer can not go behind this judgment, except for fraud or mistake as to the amount of the indebtedness.” Maddox v. Anchor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maddox v. Anchor Duck MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marion County v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Sanders v. Wilkinson CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API