Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Robinson v. Page

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2025No. 2024-1335PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 273.] THE STATE EX REL. ROBINSON, APPELLANT, v. PAGE ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Robinson v. Page,

2025-Ohio-623.] Prohibition—Mandamus—Appellant’s statement purporting to set forth balance of his inmate account for each of the preceding six months lacks the cashier’s certification required by R.C. 2969.25(C)(1)—Court of appeals’ judgment dismissing complaint affirmed. (No. 2024-1335—Submitted January 7, 2025—Decided February 27, 2025.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 24AP-233,

202…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Roden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Swopes v. McCormickOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State ex rel. Townsend v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State ex rel. Robinson v. PageOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hussein v. FreemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State ex rel. Price v. SpitlerOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  3. State ex rel. Stokes v. CombsOhio Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API