Legal Opinion · Dissent

Curlee v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 11, 1923No. 11094Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I think that the judgment should be reversed upon the clearly erroneous charge concerning the defense of contributory negligence. The Circuit Judge, in explaining the burden of proof which the law lays upon the plaintiff in such a case, declared very properly:

“The plaintiff must not only show that the defendant was negligent, * * * but that such act of negligence * * * was the*proximate cause of the injury to the plaintiff.”

He then proceeded to define “proximate cause” as referred to the act of the defendant thus:

“ ‘The proximate cause is such a cause that operates to produce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Easler v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Shealey v. South Car. & Ga. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  3. Thackston v. Port Royal &c. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API