State v. Raby
Supreme Court of North Carolina
IkdiotMEnt for fornication and adultery, tried before Norwood, J., and a jury at Fall Term, 381)7, of Macon Superior Court. The defendants were convicted and appealed, assigning as error the grounds referred to in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Furches, J.:
The defendants, .James Ruby and Ruena Shields, were indicted for the crime of fornication and adultery. The defendant, Ruena, had been married to one Mark Shields, but they were divorced at Spring Term, 1896, of Macon Superior Court. The defendants were found guilty and, after judgment; appealed, assigning three grounds of error as follows:
3. That the Court admitted evidence, tending to show the guilt of defendants, of facts that transpired since the finding of the bill of indictment. There was no error in allowing this evidence. State v. Stubbs, 108 N. C., 774; State v. Guest,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. . GuestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . StubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Powell v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. MoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.