Cunningham v. Neal
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McMEANS, Associate Justice.
-Heal sued the Sugarland Railway Company, Ed. H. Cunningham & Co., a private corporation, engaged in the manufacture of sugar, and Ed. C. Lassiter, its receiver, and W. C. Zelle, receiver, who succeeded Lassiter during the pend-ency of the litigation, and the Cunningham Sugar Company, which had taken over the property of Ed. H. Cunningham & Co. from the hands of the receiver during the pendency of the suit, for damages for personal injuries sustained by him. He alleged that while he was in the employment of defendants in the capacity of foreman of the switching crew…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gonzales v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McClainTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. DalwighTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Lott v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ReaTexas Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shuffield v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- San Angelo Water, Light & Power Co. v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Slaats v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.