Legal Opinion

Morton v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1922No. 16916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, J.:

Epitomized Opinion

James Morton, being charged with robbery, was indicted by the grand jury. His attorneys made application under sec. 13668 GC. to take deposition of witnesses outside of the state of Ohio, his attorneys assuming that the Sec. 13668 was unconstitutional. The court overruled the application, holding that Sec. 13668 as found in 103 O. L. 443 had been repealed by the substituted Sec. 13668, as found in 107 O. L. 451. This application was overruled by the court. His attorneys then made an application under the section as amended 451, which law provided that deposition…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City School District v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Harrison v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. City of Bexley v. State, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2017
  5. Gilbert v. City of ClevelandCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API