Legal Opinion
McKinney v. McGoldrick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
The applicant, in 1921, was duly appointed to the position of assistant secretary to the Transit Commission after he had duly qualified therefor in accordance with the Civil Service Law and rules. The petitioner claims his salary for the last half of September, 1934, and asks that a mandamus order issue directing the comptroller of the city of New York to pay the same.
The Transit Commission is not a city body, but is a State body. (Matter of McAneny v. Board of Estimate, etc., 232 N. Y. 377, 390.) Section 2 of article Y of the State Constitution establishes a Department of Public Service,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of McAneny v. . Bd. of Estimate, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Gubner v. McClellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colbert v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Matter of Rosenthal v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- McCoy v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Matter of Bacom v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Blyn v. BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.