Pan American Realty Trust v. Twenty One Kings, Inc., De Leo Associates Company v. Twenty One Kings, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Defendant (appellant) challenges judgments entered February 5, 1968, in two civil actions, which were consolidated for trial to the court, contending that the trial judge incorrectly interpreted separate building and architectural contracts under which plaintiffs had rendered the services for which they recovered on a quantum meruit basis. Pan American Realty Trust recovered a judgment of $27,823.14 for engineering services and expenses, with interest from April 12, 1966, an attorney’s fee of $2,500, and costs. The judgment for De Leo Associates Company was for…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- The Kronprinzessin CecilieSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- New Wrinkle, Inc. v. John L. Armitage & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Pan American Realty Trust v. Twenty One Kings, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1968
4Cited by8 opinions
- Sam E. Brown and Erma Jean Brown v. Freeman WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Mr. Carl H. Alley v. Dodge HotelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Tang How v. Edward J. Gerrits, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gregory Park, Section II, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Theodore L. Mularz v. Greater Park City CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.