Legal Opinion

Blair v. Hendricks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 23, 2000No. 1998-CA-002211-MRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBER, Judge.

This opinion affirms the ruling of the trial court that Appellant James Blair’s complaint should be dismissed as moot.

Blair filed a civil declaratory judgment action against Appellee Robert Hendricks claiming that he had improperly been punished for failure to obey an order in the course of his incarceration at Western Kentucky Correctional Complex. The order at issue was a request that Blair sign his name to an inventory list acknowledging receipt of bedding items. As a result of his refusal to sign, Blair was moved from a medium security prison to a maximum security facility…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gary Wayne Freeman v. Richard RideoutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Wycoff v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. James Carl Higgs v. David H. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. HealthAmerica Corp. of Kentucky v. Humana Health Plan, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Mahoney v. CarterKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lang v. SappCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
  3. Harrison v. Diamond Pharmacy ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  4. Lang v. SappCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API