Legal Opinion
Mainstay Cooperative Section Two, Inc. v. Hroch
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 24, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Final judgment unanimously reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed.
This controversy was submitted to the court below on an agreed statement of facts. In brief, the issue is whether a son, living with his parents in their co-operative apartment at the time they moved to Florida, remains a member of the “immediate family” when he marries and brings his wife to live with him in said apartment.
It is agreed that the stock certificate prohibits the transfer of shares without the written consent of the co-operative; that the by-laws provide that the common…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MTR OF HERZOG v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Herzog v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hartman v. SykesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- McCorkle Cooperative Apartments, Inc. v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- McCorkle Cooperative Apartments, Inc. v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamilton Cooperative Apartments, Inc. v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985