Legal Opinion

Washington v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 21, 2016No. AC37420PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner, Ikeem Washington, appeals following the habeas court's denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) abused its discretion by denying his petition for certification to appeal and (2) erred in concluding that he failed to demonstrate that his trial counsel's performance was deficient and that he was not prejudiced by the representation of his trial counsel. We dismiss the appeal.

In his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner alleged,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Washington v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API