Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 4, 1916No. 4989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Wagoner County; Leon B. Fant, Judge. C. C. McDonald brought action in replevin against Alex Cobb. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BOWLES, C.

This, is an action in re-plevin, instituted by plaintiff in error against defendant in error (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively), in the county court of Wagoner county. The replevin suit was defended upon the theory that the cattle claimed in the replevin action were rightfully held by the defendant under and by virtue of the herd law. Plaintiff complains that the defendant was not entitled to the possession of the cattle on account of irregularities in the distraint proceedings; in other words, that (1) the notice to the plaintiff, required…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ensley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Minard v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Clemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Yoather v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Jones v. DashnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Long v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Newland v. HattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API