Matter of Legislative Conference of the City Univ. of New York v. Bd. of Higher Educ. of the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs. The offer of the Board as incorporated in the Appellate Division opinion appears to be a viable solution. Grievant would have one terminal year in the post of lecturer and the Board would be required to follow “ established procedures ’ ’ in re-evaluating the grievant. Thereupon, if grievant is found worthy of appointment to the faculty, benefits can be awarded to the grievant retroactively.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
2Cited by29 opinions
- Edgar Pauk v. The Board of Trustees of the City University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- School Committee of West Springfield v. KorbutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- School Committee of Danvers v. TymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Board of Education v. Bellmore-Merrick United Secondary Teachers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cole v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.