Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pennsylvania Petroleum Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1761 C.D. 1976Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

President Judge Bowman :

The majority has quashed a petition for review in the nature of an appeal by the Pennsylvania Petroleum Association (PPA) from an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) in a rate proceedings for the reason that the competitive injury assertedly suffered by petitioner as to a class of rates for which an increase was sought by a utility and approved by the PUC is an inadequate interest to confer upon a party the necessary standing to appeal the adjudication. I concur in the result, as I *28am of the view that the particular…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API