Legal Opinion
Quan v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2005No. 03-70630Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LIN QUAN, No. 03-70630 Petitioner, v. Agency No. A75-684-401 ALBERTO F. GONZALES, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 6, 2005* Pasadena, California Filed November 7, 2005 Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Robert H. Whaley,** United States District Judge. Opinion by Judge Whaley; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain *This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kamla Prasad Meena Kumari Prasad Catherine Sandhya Prasad Micky Sudesh Prasad Ricky Sumit Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Shpetim Hoxha v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.