Legal Opinion

Davis v. Shanks

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. 94-1125PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In this cause, we consider whether a probate court erred by refusing to consider extrinsic evidence to determine the meaning of the term “contents” as used in a will.

Jesse Harris executed a will in December of 1992 leaving to Jesse Davis the house they shared and “all the contents therein; EXCEPT, the curio cabinet and Dresden dolls.” Harris placed stock certificates valued at about $220,000 in Davis’ bag in a closet of the house. In a sealed letter that Davis was to open upon Harris’ death, Harris told Davis where to find the stock certificates and instructed him to take them.

Harris died in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. El Paso National Bank v. Shriners Hospital for Crippled ChildrenTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re the Estate of ShoptaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In re the Construction of Will of SteverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Steger v. Muenster Drilling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance Co. v. James, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  3. Sammons v. Elder, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  4. Harris v. Hines, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  5. Nash v. Beckett, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API