Legal Opinion · Dissent
State v. Cross
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 2000No. WD 57145Published
1DissentEllis, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
“A person commits the crime of ‘driving while intoxicated’ if he operates a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated or drugged condition.” § 577.010.1, RSMo (1994) (emphasis in original). Section 577.001.1, RSMo (1994), defined “operates” as used in the statute to mean, “physically driving or operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle.” In 1996, the Legislature amended the definition of “operates” in § 577.001.1 to read, “physically driving or operating a motor vehicle.” § 577.001.1, RSMo Cum.Supp. (1999). The amendment deleted the phrase “or being…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wollard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Kilbane v. Director of the Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Wilcox v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Commonwealth v. UskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- State v. RumbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.