Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Cross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 2000No. WD 57145Published

1DissentEllis, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

“A person commits the crime of ‘driving while intoxicated’ if he operates a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated or drugged condition.” § 577.010.1, RSMo (1994) (emphasis in original). Section 577.001.1, RSMo (1994), defined “operates” as used in the statute to mean, “physically driving or operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle.” In 1996, the Legislature amended the definition of “operates” in § 577.001.1 to read, “physically driving or operating a motor vehicle.” § 577.001.1, RSMo Cum.Supp. (1999). The amendment deleted the phrase “or being…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wollard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Kilbane v. Director of the Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Wilcox v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. UskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. State v. RumbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API