Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Gile

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 1948No. 3769Published

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The testatrix plainly intended that her brother and his wife should have life estates in the residue of her estate, with power to use so much of the principal as should be requisite for their support and comfort. No provision was made by the testatrix for the intervention of a trustee, and we are of the opinion that no trust should be implied.

The testatrix expressed her confidence in her brother by naming him sole executor of her will “to serve by giving nominal bond.” She intended the residue to be first used for the benefit of the defendants, and at their deaths the petitioner is entitled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. HillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  2. Kelley v. KenistonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Little v. ColmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  4. Belford v. OlsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  5. Donovan v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API