Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Wisti

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1972No. Docket 11984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.

This is a malpractice action brought against the Hancock law firm of Wisti & Jaaskelainen by plaintiff husband and wife, Jacques and Jane Cassidy. The action in the Houghton County Circuit Court resulted in a jury verdict in favor of defendants of no cause of action. Plaintiffs appeal as of right following the denial by the trial court of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and/or new trial.

The motivating force behind the present action was the conduct of defendant attorney Wisti who stipulated, seemingly without the knowledge of his clients, the plaintiffs herein, to set aside…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Braidwood v. HarmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. DOWNRIVER LOAN CO. v. GabbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sawabini v. DesenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Cassidy v. WistiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API