Legal Opinion

Barber v. Corpus Christi Bank & Trust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1974No. 811PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

This is a promissory note case. Corpus Christi Bank and Trust instituted the suit against Robert Choate and W. J. Barber. The cause was severed as to Choate and a judgment was taken against him. That judgment was not appealed. Thereafter, the cause proceeded to trial (b'fefore a jury) against Barber. The jury found that Barber did not sign the note as a “borrower” (Special Issue No. 1), but did sign the same as an “accommodation endorsement” (Special Issue No. 2). Judgment was rendered for the Bank against Barber for the amount due on the note, plus interest thereon.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kirk v. HeadTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kirby Lumber Co. v. Temple Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ives v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Dirck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Inman v. PadrezasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Tennell v. Esteve Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Endsley Electric, Inc. v. Altech, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API