State v. Vanorsdel

Keith VanOrsdel (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction of attempted enticement of a child. See section 566.151.1 In his sole point on appeal, Defendant argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress statements he made and evidence obtained following an investigatory stop of his vehicle as the illegal fruit of an unreasonable search and seizure. Because the officer involved had specific, articulable facts that provided a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, we affirm.

Standard of Review

We review

a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress in the light most…