Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 9, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

Appellee’s intestate, A. E. Simpson, was, at the time of bis death, 56 years old, and bad been in the employ of appellant thirty years as an engineer. On August 2, 1930, be was directed by appellant to run engine 775, known as Extra 775, a freight train, from the Pine Bluff, Arkansas, shops to the Texarkana, Arkansas, yards. Before leaving Pine Bluff the conductor and engineer were each given order No. 104, the material part of which is as follows: “Eng. 775 run extra Pine Bluff shops to Texarkana yards, has right over No. 18 Eng. unknown Pine Bluff shops to cross over McNeil.” This being an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Unadilla Valley Railway Co. v. CaldineSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. SkipperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sylvester v. U-Drive-Em SystemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Carmichael v. Mercury Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. DillingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Boone v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API