Legal Opinion

Olschesky v. Houston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1987No. 865SC561PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

This appeal is from two orders denying defendant’s motions to dimiss for insufficient service of process. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal.

On 3 July 1981, plaintiffs Olschesky and Morton filed separate complaints against defendant Clarence W. Houston. Each individually alleged that defendant had committed assault and battery.

A summons was issued with each complaint addressed to defendant “Clarence W. Houston, 5409 Ridgewood Heights Drive, Wilmington, N.C.” Deputy J. W. Greer served the Olschesky com*416plaint and summons on 14 July 1981 by leaving the documents with Robert…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Estrada v. BurnhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Guthrie v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. J. M. Thompson Co. v. Doral Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Fungaroli v. FungaroliCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v. Palmetto Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Grimsley v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Grimsley v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API