Legal Opinion

Haden v. United States

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a motion to set aside a judgment obtained upon certificate.

1Opinion of the Court

HOPKÍNS, C. J.

— At the last term of this Court Haden and Everett filed an incomplete transcript of a record of a cause between the United States and themselves, together with a writ of error which they had sued out, in the case, returnable to that term.

Upon their motion a writ of certiorari was issued to the clerk of the Court below, requiring him to *394send and certify to the present term of the Court, a complete transcript of the record.

The law requires the clerk to make up a full and perfect record of all the proceedings in the cause and to give an attested copy of such record to the party by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carleton & Slade v. Goodwin'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  2. Winthrow v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. State v. MelvilleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API