Legal Opinion

Garner v. Garner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1984No. 2-84-045-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUGHES, Justice.

Jamie Michelle Weaver Garner has appealed the judgment of the trial court which awarded the custody of the minor son of Mrs. Garner to Lavaughn and George Armstrong, the paternal grandparents.

We affirm.

The basis of this appeal as urged by Mrs. Garner in her appellant’s brief is abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in awarding custody to the Armstrongs. There are nineteen points of error urged by Mrs. Garner in an effort to prove such abuse.

The testimony gleaned from the twelve volume statement of facts reflects sufficient evidence to support the judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mumma v. AguirreTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Herrera v. HerreraTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Smitheal v. SmithealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Yancey v. KoonceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of P.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. in the Interest of B.B.R. A/K/A F.D.R.T., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  3. In Re BBRCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. in the Interest of B.B.R. A/K/A F.D.R.T., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API