Legal Opinion
In Re: Nanodynamics (Wallach v. Smith)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 13, 2018No. 17-2410-bkUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
17-2410-bk In Re: Nanodynamics (Wallach v. Smith) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re: Wayne E. Bell, Jr., Debtor. Wayne E. Bell, Jr. v. Deborah BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re Exide TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Apex Pool Equipment Corp. v. Stephen C. Lee and the Paramount Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.