Legal Opinion

Hostetter v. Adams

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 18, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, C. J.

The bill alleges that the plaintiffs are, and for 27 years or more have been, partners doing business as Hostetter & Smith, and during that time engaged in making and selling a medicine known as “Hostetter’s Celebrated Stomach Bitters;” that they have the sole ownership of the good-will, labels, or trade-marks of said bitters; that said bitters have 'acquired a reputation as a safe and valuable medicine; that, in order to designate said bitters as of their own compounding and as genuine, and to prevent fraud by having spurious bitters sold as and for the genuine, they from the beginning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Colman v. . CrumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Frese v. BachofU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hostetter v. VowinkleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1871
  2. Hygienic Products Co. v. Judson Dunaway CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1948
  3. Frost v. RindskopfU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API