Legal Opinion

Turner v. N. C. & St. L. Railway

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1955PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

There are two questions involved in this lawsuit. The first is whether or not we should change the rule of statutory construction, adopted by this Court in Reed v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co., 136 Tenn. 499, 190 S. W. 458, 459, of Code Section, Williams’ Annotated Code, Sec. 8572. The second question is whether or not there has been such fraudulent concealment'of necessary and pertinent facts on the part of the Railroad Company as would authorize the present action.

Mrs. Turner filed this suit on October 5, 1954, for herself and her two minor children suing the Railroad Company for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moran v. WeinbergerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Patten v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Reed v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Poppenheimer v. Bluff City Motor Homes, Division of Bluff City Buick Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  2. Chambliss v. Coca-Cola Bottling CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  3. Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation v. James A. StapletonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Balsinger v. GassTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Floyd v. RentropTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API