Legal Opinion

Paul Bailey's, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 21, 1975PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.

The commissioner of motor vehicles, after reviewing the evidence produced at a hearing held at the department of motor vehicles on April 18,1972, concluded that the plaintiff had violated the provisions of § 14-64 of the General Statutes. As a result, all licenses, general distinguishing registrations and the temporary stamp of the plaintiff were revoked for three days, it was required to post a $1000 bond and its official inspection station permit was revoked. Section 14-64 has since been amended; Public Acts 1973, No. 73-674; Public Acts 1974, Nov 74-107; but, as it read at tbe time of tbe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. Balch Pontiac-Buick, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. CofoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. State v. CataudellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Madow v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API