Binkowski v. Bd. of Educ. of New Haven
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBright, J.
*582The plaintiff, Amy Binkowski, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants Yolanda Jones-Generette and Linda O'Brien1 following the granting of their motion to *282strike her third revised complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that her complaint failed, as a matter of law, to allege facts that would bring it within the intentional tort exception to the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes §§ 31-275 et seq., as set forth in General Statutes § 31-293a. We disagree and, accordingly,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Sullivan v. Lake Compounce Theme Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Melanson v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sempey v. Stamford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022