Legal Opinion

Binkowski v. Bd. of Educ. of New Haven

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 29, 2017No. AC 39298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBright, J.

*582The plaintiff, Amy Binkowski, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants Yolanda Jones-Generette and Linda O'Brien1 following the granting of their motion to *282strike her third revised complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that her complaint failed, as a matter of law, to allege facts that would bring it within the intentional tort exception to the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes §§ 31-275 et seq., as set forth in General Statutes § 31-293a. We disagree and, accordingly,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Sullivan v. Lake Compounce Theme Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Melanson v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sempey v. Stamford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API