Legal Opinion
Hill Lines, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Pittsburg Plate Glass Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1955No. 4993PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting a summary judgment in favor of third-party defendant, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company. Its employee, Jesus Sanchez, received serious injuries in the course of his employment while helping to unload a truck owned by Hill Lines, Inc. at Pittsburgh’s docks. Sanchez, who had received compensation under the provisions of the New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 57-901 et seq., Laws 1929, and supplemented by Laws 1937, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Pittsburgh’s insurance carrier, as subrogee, instituted an action for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Burris v. American Chicle Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Iowa Power and Light Co. v. Abild Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Elston v. Industrial Lift Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Artesia v. CarterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Montoya v. Greenway Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.