Legal Opinion
Constand v. Cosby
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 31, 2006No. Civ.A. No. 05-1099PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ motions to compel further deposition testimony (docs, no. 49 and 50) and plaintiffs motion for sanctions (doc. no. 48).
Discovery in this case began with the exchange of interrogatories and requests for production, and the taking of the depositions of plaintiff and defendant. During the course of discovery, several issues arose which the parties brought to the Court’s attention for resolution via letter.1 The instant dispute over the parties responses at deposition was raised in an October 5, 2005 letter from…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. CosbyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Medline Industries, Inc. v. Diversey, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021