Blinds & Carpet Gallery, Inc. v. E.E.M. Realty, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In order to prevail on a motion for a preliminary injunction,
*692the movant must demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury absent the granting of the preliminary injunction, and (3) that a balancing of the equities favors the movant’s position (see Tatum v Newell Funding, LLC, 63 AD3d 911, 912 [2009]; Gluck v Hoary, 55 AD3d 668 [2008]; Apa Sec., Inc. v Apa, 37 AD3d 502, 503 [2007]). The decision to grant or deny a preliminary injunction rests in the sound discretion of the Supreme Court (see Automated Waste Disposal,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ruiz v. MeloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Automated Waste Disposal, Inc. v. Mid-Hudson Waste, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Apa Security, Inc. v. ApaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Matos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Gluck v. Chevre Liady Nusach HoaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- County of Suffolk v. GivensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Parolisi v. SlavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cooper v. Board of White Sands CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Parolisi v. SlavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Incorporated Village of Manorhaven v. TonerNew York Supreme Court · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.