Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. Cook

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1965No. 5-3537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is primarily a boundary line dispute between the appellee Eunice K. Batchelor and the other appellees and cross-appellants, Albert and Bill Cook. The appellant, D. W. Hoskins, is Mrs. Batchelor’s tenant and joined her as a plaintiff in the case. The chancellor upheld Mrs. Batchelor’s claim to the strip of land in dispute and fixed Hoskins ’ crop damage at $50, a sum Avhich he thinks to be inadequate.

We consider first the principal controversy between Mrs. Batchelor and the Cooks. It is conceded that Mrs. Batchelor holds the record title to the strip in dispute, which lies just east of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown Paper Mill Co. v. WarnixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Barnes v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Troxler v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Camp v. LiberatoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Camp v. LiberatoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API