United States v. Waring

GLADIS, Judge:

Relying on United States v. Williamson, 4 M.J. 708 (N.C.M.R.1977), pet. denied 5 M.J. 219 (C.M.A.1978), the accused contends on appeal that the military judge’s plea providence inquiry was deficient because he did not make a statement on the record that he considered all the provisions of the plea bargain to be in accord with appellate case *731law, not against public policy, and not contrary to his own notions of fundamental fairness. We find no merit in his contention because the decisions of the Court of Military Appeals do not require such a statement and Williamson, supra, does…