Nienstedt v. Dorrington
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yuma. Frank Baxter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN, G. J.
The appellee had judgment against the appellant for the restitution of certain lands and premises. The certificate of the clerk of the court below shows that judgment was rendered January 28, 1913, on which day, appellant’s motion for a new trial being denied, he gave notice of appeal to this court; that on January 30, 1913, the bond on appeal was filed; that on April 28, 1913, the appellant filed With the clerk of the lower court the transcript of the reporter’s notes in said cause; that no further steps have been taken by appellant to prosecute his appeal to this court.
It is…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Baca v. Noyes-Norman Shoe Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Mounce v. GarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Scott v. CowanArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Williams v. West Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Head Hotel Co. v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.