Legal Opinion · Dissent

Edinger v. Edinger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1965No. 37375Published

1DissentHill, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent. In my opinion, the evidence does not substantiate the trial court’s finding that the wife treated the plaintiff husband cruelly, or that she caused him to suffer personal indignities rendering his life burdensome. The matters complained of occurred over a period of many years, and were incidents or attitudes that should have been forgiven and forgotten in the usual give and take of married life. See Bang v. Bang, 57 Wn.2d 602, 358 P.2d 960 (1961); Wiggins v. Wiggins, 55 Wn.2d 390, 347 P.2d 1073 (1960); Best v. Best, 48 Wn.2d 252, 292 P.2d 1061 (1956); Neff v. Neff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neff v. NeffWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Bang v. BangWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Best v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Wiggins v. WigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API