Legal Opinion

Franchi v. Shapiro

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 1997No. 96-1635Published

1Per curiam

Pursuant to our mandate in Franchi v. Shapiro, 650 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995),1 a successor judge held an evidentiary hearing at which defendant-appellant Domenic Franchi was given an opportunity to explain his actions. Ultimately, the lower court entered the order appealed which, once again, struck Franchi’s pleadings and entered a default against him.

We reverse, as the record does not support the trial court’s conclusion that Franchi wil-fully and deliberately deceived the court into believing he was too ill to testify or travel to Dade County. See, e.g., K & K World Enter., Inc. v. Union…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. K & K WORLD ENTERPRISE, INC. v. Union Spol, SRODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Franchi v. ShapiroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API