Legal Opinion

Smallridge v. Macalaster Bicknell Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: It was error for the court to vacate the judgment entered against defendant Fisch on grounds of excusable default (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). The only excuse offered for defendant’s failure to *881answer was that defendant was suffering from "confusion” and "great personal stress and financial difficulties.” Defendant thus failed to show a reasonable excuse for the delay and also failed to demonstrate that his defense has merit (Gray v B. R. Trucking Co., 59 NY2d 649; Eaton v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Gray v. B. R. Trucking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neuman v. GreenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Smith v. FritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. In re Estate of DegnanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Tortorello v. TortorelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Voss Dental Lab, Inc. v. Surgitex, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API