Legal Opinion
Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Porterfield
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1968No. 41068PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
This appeal requires this court to determine when imported fungible goods, such as iron ore, cease to be imports under the provisions of Clause 2 of Section 10, Article I of the Constitution of the United States, which reads:
“No state shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws; and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such laws shall be subject to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Low v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Cook v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- May v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beall Pipe & Tank Corporation v. State Tax Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- In Re the Appeal of Asheville Citizen-Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Production Steel Strip Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Republic Steel Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.