Legal Opinion

In Re Copeland

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 19, 1972No. BK 70-94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

LATCHUM, District Judge.

A hearing was held on May 11, 1972 on the petition of the Union Bank of Switzerland (“UBS”) for review of an order entered on February 4, 1972 by the Honorable Murray M. Schwartz, Referee in Bankruptcy, (Referee’s Docket Item 304). The Referee’s order in question (1) denied UBS’s motion to strike the affirmative defenses pleaded in the debtor’s amended objection to UBS’s proof of claim, 1 however, reserving unto UBS the right to renew its motion to strike the second affirmative defense at the conclusion of debtor’s discovery, (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re PrindibleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Irving Sulmeyer v. Arthur Donald PfohlmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. In re GraboyesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. In re McDougaldDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  5. In the Matter of H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc., Bankrupt-Appellee. Beol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Copeland v. Emroy Investors, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  2. In Re RadtkeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
  3. Copeland v. Emroy Investors, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API