Legal Opinion

In Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing Severally to Policy No. THM000938-01 v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 11, 2024No. 13-24-00428-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-24-00428-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING SEVERALLY TO POLICY NO. THM000938-01 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina1 By petition for writ of mandamus, relators Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London Subscribing Severally to Policy No. THM000938-01 contend that the trial court2 abused its discretion by: (1) striking their plea in intervention; and (2) denying their…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re H.E.B. Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API